Key Takeaways
- A number of ego-driven crypto personalities suffered enormous falls from grace in 2022.
- Terra’s failure uncovered among the crypto ecosystem’s largest villains.
- Policymakers and scammers additionally harmed the area this yr.
Share this text
SBF, Kwon, 3AC, and extra: 2022 was a packed yr for crypto villains.
The Crypto Villains of the 12 months
The Crypto Briefing editorial staff places a whole lot of thought into our end-of-year lists. There are sometimes disagreements on who ought to characteristic and we find yourself spending a whole lot of time going backwards and forwards on concepts till the record will get finalized. This yr’s prime 10 crypto villains record was the toughest one we’ve ever put collectively.
After a yr just like the one we’ve simply had, it was an virtually not possible job to select simply 10 villains. There are apparent candidates like Sam Bankman-Fried and his associates who helped him commit the most important fraud of the century at FTX and Alameda Analysis. Whereas mainstream media retailers have hardly lobbed softballs on the entrepreneur now generally known as “Rip-off Bankrun-Fraud,” we felt it was vital to name out him and everybody else who was concerned within the scandal, which is why they collectively take the highest spot for 2022.
In one other replace that ought to shock nobody, Su Zhu is again alongside Kyle Davies following Three Arrows Capital’s implosion, and Do Kwon, arguably the individual chargeable for probably the most injury in crypto this yr, additionally options.
The largest twist to this yr’s record is the heavy skew towards former “heroes” within the area. There was a time when guys like SBF and Kwon had been idolized, which raises questions on how the crypto neighborhood ought to determine the subsequent villains once they arrive (as a result of extra will arrive).
Past the plain names, we settled on a couple of evil varieties who appeared to get away with making financial institution on the neighborhood’s expense, policymakers who went heavy on anti-crypto rhetoric, and a few good old style scammers.
As ever, there have been loads of hackers and rug pullers that went unmentioned, however that doesn’t negate the damage they induced for their very own monetary achieve this yr. We additionally excluded teams and establishments, which meant omitting the likes of Lazarus Group (for the $550 million Ronin Community assault and different cyber thefts) and the U.S. Treasury Division (for utilizing Lazarus Group’s actions as an excuse to sanction Twister Money).
All in all, it’s the most important record of con artists we’ve ever put collectively, and we hope that not less than among the candidates are served their simply deserts by the tip of 2023. Behold, and take thorough notes on the crimson flags to look out for on the subsequent market cycle.
Sam Bankman-Fried and Pals
A number of the key members of the SBF-led FTX and Alameda Analysis cartel (L-R: Nishad Singh through Autism Capital, Sam Bankman-Fried through Getty, Caroline Ellison through @carolinecapital, Sam Trabucco through Forbes, Gary Wang through Crunchbase, Constance Wang through LinkedIn)
The issue with overlaying the FTX scandal right here is that there are nonetheless so many unknowns, and we don’t know what to imagine—particularly when Sam Bankman-Fried’s personal feedback have amounted to cryptic tweets and leaked apology notes that examine as coherently as you’d count on from somebody who was allegedly caning stimulants on the common.
However placing apart the studies of amphetamine abuse, orgies, luxurious property acquisitions, and suspicious donations to political figures, there’s one cause above all else that Bankman-Fried is crypto’s Public Enemy Quantity One: he stole $10 billion of FTX clients’ cash.
Whereas FTX has solely just lately declared chapter and authorized proceedings are ongoing, we do know that Bankman-Fried secretly siphoned buyer funds from FTX to his buying and selling agency Alameda Analysis because the agency confronted insolvency after Terra’s blowup. Twitter messages Bankman-Fried exchanged with a Vox journalist additionally reveal that Alameda may have been enjoying with FTX cash lengthy earlier than Terra imploded, and simply as shockingly, his persona of advantage was a deliberate facade to get anybody he needed—politicians, media publications, sports activities personalities, supermodels—onside.
Bankman-Fried made out that he was on this area “to make a worldwide impression for good” (on San Francisco billboards adorning his face and scruffy, unkempt hair, no much less), however the entire current revelations have solid doubt on that declare. Whereas we will’t conclusively say whether or not Bankman-Fried had good intentions or was evil from the outset, we don’t suppose it’s a stretch to say that he’s at all times had a giant ego, and that led to his astonishing fall from grace.
Both approach, it’s the sheer deception that makes Bankman-Fried our primary villain of the yr. This was a man who sat in entrance of Congress warning in opposition to the dangers of opaque crypto practices understanding that he’d stolen from his clients with the identical practices. Virtually everybody purchased into his con, which has added damage on prime of the staggering monetary losses the neighborhood has suffered from FTX’s insolvency.
It’s vital to notice that Bankman-Fried, a proficient son of two Stanford Regulation Faculty professors, grew up privileged earlier than he turned to crypto and efficient altruism. This would possibly clarify why, in opposition to all odds, he’s nonetheless strolling free in The Bahamas, and mainstream retailers like The New York Instances and The Wall Road Journal have handed him clear passes of their current protection.
After we discuss Bankman-Fried, we even have to say the likes of Caroline Ellison, Sam Trabucco, Gary Wang, Constance Wang, and Nishad Singh. Although it’s unclear how a lot involvement every of them had in FTX’s fraudulent practices, it’s identified that they had been all a part of the internal circle that Bankman-Fried confided in as he presided over his empire.
After we had been placing collectively our record, one member of our editorial staff mentioned that “Bankman-Fried is to crypto what Palpatine is to Star Wars.” In different phrases, he’s as despicable because it will get, and those that enabled his actions aren’t a lot better. We sincerely hope that justice is served in 2023. Chris Williams
Do Kwon
Supply: Bloomberg
Till a couple of month in the past, there was just one contender for our number-one villain spot: Do Kwon. However whereas the failed Korean entrepreneur in all probability isn’t as horrible as Sam Bankman-Fried, he’s indisputably chargeable for colossal injury and struggling that may maintain the crypto ecosystem again for years.
Much like Bankman-Fried, Kwon was a whizz child who grew to become a celebrity virtually in a single day. On many events, he made it apparent that he didn’t know find out how to deal with the celebrity. As Terra soared to new excessive after new excessive and his paper riches grew, he began calling himself the “Grasp of Stablecoin” and dismissing others who hadn’t occurred to invent a flawed money-printing algorithmic stablecoin as “poor.” Kwon loved the limelight however he had skinny pores and skin; he proved that when he unleashed assaults like that “your measurement just isn’t measurement” tweet that grew to become the stuff of Crypto Twitter legend. There was additionally a laughable lawsuit risk that Terraform Labs despatched to Crypto Briefing after we printed a satirical warning that Terra would fail close to LUNA’s prime on April Fools’ Day, however that ended up trying simply as silly as his hubris-filled tweets as soon as Terra suffered its inevitable demise. Neither Kwon nor his legal professionals have responded to any of our messages requesting feedback on Terra’s implosion.
It ought to go with out saying that Kwon is one among crypto’s largest villains ever, particularly given the destruction that Terra’s failure has induced. Kwon has steered that Terra was a market failure, as if Terraform Labs’ efforts to model UST as a “stablecoin” had been legit and above board. He’s additionally maintained that LFG’s reserves went into saving UST, denying allegations the funds had been moved elsewhere.
Whereas we will’t show something and he’s evaded most tough questions following the dying spiral, we suspect that Kwon had a sense that Terra would fail, which is perhaps why he dedicated to accumulating a Bitcoin reserve fund by means of the Luna Basis Guard. If he was conscious of Terra’s future, which is believable given his ties to Foundation Money, that solely makes his actions extra deplorable.
Terra’s collapse led to very large monetary losses and, within the worst circumstances, suicides, however Kwon has proven little regret. He tried to relaunch Terra even after repeated calls to vanish from crypto endlessly and has made it clear that he nonetheless loves consideration, showing on Crypto Twitter and podcasts as soon as Bankman-Fried took his place on the villain prime spot.
Kwon made it onto Interpol’s crimson record in September, however he insists that he’s not “on the run.” We’re undecided what else fleeing your nation of residence and refusing to disclose your location may very well be known as, however then nothing he’s mentioned this yr must be taken too critically.
Kwon did have one pearl of knowledge, although. In a single interview, he infamously warned that “the failure of UST is equal to the failure of crypto itself.” After the chaos that Terra induced this yr, his message proved to be extra on-point than anybody of us dared to think about. Chris Williams
Su Zhu and Kyle Davies
Supply: Bloomberg
Within the laundry record of disgraced founders that met their very own undoing this yr, maybe none had been as revered as Su Zhu and, by extension, his companion Kyle Davies. Davies might have been complicit in what turned out to be yet one more multibillion-dollar rip-off, but it surely was Zhu, together with his mysterious persona and cryptic, zen-like tweets, who captured the creativeness and impressed disciples.
Zhu and Davies launched Three Arrows Capital in 2012 and located success in foreign currency trading earlier than pivoting to crypto in 2018. Zhu famously known as the underside of 2018 crypto winter after watching Bitcoin’s staggering run-up the earlier yr. “We are going to pump off the underside extraordinarily shortly, leaving most sideline buyers caught in fiat,” he tweeted on December 21, 2018. Bitcoin was buying and selling at $4,000 on the time, whereas Ethereum had simply touched double digits.
By 2021, the market hailed Zhu and Davies as geniuses, pontificating knowledge and strolling the earth because the dwelling embodiment of success. 3AC’s fundamental shill was that crypto had crossed the brink into “the Supercycle,” a thesis that claimed crypto had turn out to be resistant to sharp drawdowns owing to rising mainstream curiosity within the area. The jargon is dense however the concept isn’t—Zhu and Davies merely satisfied a whole lot of good, wealthy, profitable folks that the value of Bitcoin would by no means right once more in precisely the way in which it at all times had earlier than.
Not solely that, however everybody within the crypto enterprise was getting in on 3AC’s motion. When the market boomed all through 2021, so did 3AC and everybody alongside for the trip.
However everyone knows what occurred subsequent. When costs declined, a whole ecosystem that trusted them persistently trending up endlessly fell in on itself. The Supercycle idea was “regrettably incorrect,” Zhu later mentioned on Twitter, in all probability in opposition to the desires of his legal professionals. “Regrettable” is one phrase for it; “stupidly irresponsible” is perhaps one other. It’s one factor to have an exuberantly bullish stance on one thing; it’s one other factor to guess every thing on it, particularly if that features different folks’s cash.
And if you begin to hint whose cash was whose, the result’s a grotesque net of incestuous, high-risk, leveraged buying and selling amongst a well-recognized solid of unruly characters, with 3AC proper within the got-dang center of it.
Quickly after it grew to become clear that 3AC was bust, Zhu and Davies successfully disappeared—Zhu stopped tweeting, they stopped turning as much as their workplace, and even stopped answering the cellphone. We scarcely heard a phrase from both of them, save for a Bloomberg interview through which the pair tried to downplay antics like their plans to spaff $50 million on a Dogecoin-themed superyacht.
They’ve since resurfaced on Twitter to goad Sam Bankman-Fried following FTX’s collapse, with some speculating that they may very well be seeking to increase a brand new fund. Whereas they’re nonetheless lacking IRL, Davies has been spouting disingenuous platitudes and insisting they’ve “a narrative to inform,” as if this had been a primetime Oprah particular and never a multi-billion-dollar fraud.
Zhu, in the meantime, has been browsing. Jacob Oliver
Alex Mashinsky
Supply: Piaras Ó Mídheach/Sportsfile through Getty Photos
Alex Mashinsky is the previous CEO of Celsius, a lending agency that froze buyer withdrawals because of “excessive market situations” in June then filed for chapter weeks later. Celsius was one among a number of dominoes to fall following Terra and Three Arrows Capital’s blowups, however the firm’s chapter filings revealed that Mashinsky was in charge for a lot of of its troubles.
By promoting undercollateralized loans and taking huge danger, Celsius ended up with a ten-figure gap in its stability sheet—a gap that Mashinsky tried to shore up by directionally buying and selling Bitcoin with buyer funds, shedding much more within the course of. One other of Mashinsky’s sensible concepts was to carry onto Celsius shopper funds and look forward to up solely mode to renew available in the market to pay them again, however by then he was now not in management. He additionally proposed for the corporate to rebrand to “Kelvin” and deal with providing custodial companies for crypto customers, however that plan had no legs both. He resigned as CEO in September.
It was later revealed that Mashinsky and different executives had withdrawn tens of millions of {dollars} from Celsius earlier than locking out their clients, one other bombshell revelation that ought to certainly assure his time behind bars.
Mashinsky grew to become well-known for peddling the slogan “Banks are usually not your mates” on Celsius-branded merchandise. Much like different villains on this yr’s record, he rose to prominence by making out that he was a Robin Hood determine, however in actuality he was nearer to Prince John—a grasping, deceitful idiot who guess every thing and misplaced.
Contemplating Mashinsky’s liberal perspective towards dealing with shopper funds, it’s a miracle that he’s nonetheless strolling free. And perhaps he is aware of this all too properly: two weeks after Celsius froze buyer funds, the corporate needed to difficulty an announcement denying that Mashinsky had tried to flee the USA. Tom Carreras
Avraham Eisenberg
Supply: Unchained
So far as villains go, Avraham Eisenberg is a “lawful evil” operator. A self-described “utilized sport theorist,” Eisenberg rose to prominence when he introduced that he was chargeable for the $100 million exploit on Solana DeFi protocol Mango Markets in October.
Eisenberg took benefit of the low liquidity ranges on Solana to govern the worth of Mango Markets’ MNGO token. After artificially elevating MNGO’s worth, he used it as collateral to withdraw property from the protocol. This left Mango Markets with $100 million of “dangerous debt” to customers that had deposited property into the protocol.
Whereas most onlookers would say that Eisenberg had clearly exploited a weak DeFi protocol, he unapologetically referred to the act as “a extremely worthwhile buying and selling technique.” Predictably, this ruffled feathers within the crypto neighborhood. Some onlookers keep that Eisenberg used the protocol as meant, so his exploit was truthful sport. Others are much less satisfied.
Eisenberg’s Mango Markets assault later impressed an analogous $1 million exploit on Solend; Eisenberg denied any involvement within the incident in a message to Crypto Briefing. DeFi favourite Aave was additionally hit quickly after the Solana DeFi assaults when somebody manipulated the value of Curve Finance’s CRV token; nevertheless, this exploit appeared to backfire and misplaced the perpetrator cash. Eisenberg is broadly believed to be the Aave attacker, however he advised Crypto Briefing he was not chargeable for any “manipulating” on CRV’s worth. Nonetheless, he didn’t hesitate to capitalize on the incident over on Crypto Twitter. “Couple extra liquidations then up solely,” he joked in a determined bid for likes and retweets following the incident, referencing a legendary meme from Three Arrows co-founder Kyle Davies.
Whereas Eisenberg has wreaked havoc in DeFi and left behind a path of destruction, there’s a good argument that he’s really a villain the crypto business wants. If DeFi is to scale, it must be failproof, and other people like Eisenberg are enjoying an element in making it safer by stress testing protocols with an abundance of capital and knack for sniffing out vulnerabilities. Tim Craig
Michael Patryn AKA 0xSifu
Supply: @0xSifu
Wonderland Cash was a breakout star of the 2021 bull run. Based by Daniele Sestagalli with a treasury managed by pseudonymous crypto character 0xSifu, the Avalanche-based DeFi undertaking was broadly considered the one profitable OlympusDAO fork. Nonetheless, every thing got here crashing down in January 2022 when the crypto neighborhood found 0xSifu was QuadrigaCX’s felony co-founder Michael Patryn. QuadrigaCX grew to become one among crypto’s most controversial exchanges after shedding $200 million in buyer funds. Patryn had already been convicted of a number of crimes earlier than his involvement within the firm, together with identification theft and conspiracy to commit bank card fraud. So it’s fairly comprehensible that TIME holders grew to become involved about leaving him in command of the $700 million that, on the time, constituted the Wonderland treasury.
Sestagalli’s status by no means recovered after it was revealed that he had saved 0xSifu’s identification below wraps. Neither did 0xSifu’s, however that didn’t cease the previous convict from staying energetic on Crypto Twitter and mocking on the neighborhood’s diatribes in opposition to him. Greater than anybody else on our record, 0xSifu has leaned into his “villain” persona, commonly posting memes warning folks to not belief him with their funds. He additionally launched a nugatory meme token and compelled by means of a Wonderland proposal to allocate $25 million into it. Did 0xSifu’s brazenness function inspiration for Do Kwon and different crypto villains to unapologetically stick round after they fell from grace? In that case, they nonetheless have a lot to study from the grasp. Tom Carreras
Martin “Syber” van Blerk
Supply: Waikato Enterprise Information
For those who learn Crypto Briefing’s current Heroes of the 12 months record, you’ll have seen Pixelmon’s zombie turtle Kevin make a considerably unconventional look. Since we’ve acknowledged how one poorly-rendered sprite helped folks discover humor in one of many largest NFT rug pulls in historical past, it’s solely proper that its perpetrator holds a spot on our villains record.
Martin van Blerk began the Pixelmon undertaking below the pseudonym “Syber” in late 2021. The undertaking talked a superb speak and lured in 1000’s of speculators regardless of its eye-watering 3 ETH mint worth. Nonetheless, as soon as the Pixelmon euphoria died down, many who had aped in needed to face actuality.
It turned out that Pixelmon’s advertising was all a ruse to trick overly optimistic minters into handing over their ETH. The artwork was copied, the execution sucked, and communication was patchy. As stress mounted, van Blerk revealed his identification, and it grew to become obvious that the NFT neighborhood had simply handed over tens of millions to an inexperienced youngster who was in approach over his head.
Some have since defended van Blerk and blamed minters for speeding into Pixelmon with out doing correct analysis. However so far as we’re involved, he knew what he was doing, even when he didn’t count on his rip-off to be as profitable because it was. To be truthful to van Blerk, he has since used the $71.4 million raised to rent a correct staff of builders and artists, and Pixelmon is beginning to appear like it may turn out to be a half-decent sport—when it will definitely launches. However that’s in all probability not a lot comfort for individuals who had been tricked into shopping for into the undertaking below false pretenses. Tim Craig
Justin Solar
Supply: Bloomberg
TRON founder Justin Solar has at all times been a controversial determine in crypto, however this yr he took his enterprise machinations to a brand new degree by capitalizing on a number of tragic occasions. Each time there was concern, uncertainty, or a lack of consumer funds, Solar has come out of the woodwork to hawk schemes and revenue from the chaos.
In Might, he doubled down on plans for his USDD algorithmic stablecoin days after Terra’s UST collapsed in a whirlwind dying spiral. Solar watched as droves of buyers misplaced their life financial savings betting on Terra and its cheerleader Do Kwon, however that wasn’t sufficient to dissuade him from selling his personal dollar-pegged asset, promising “zero-risk” yields of as much as 30%, days after the collapse. By all accounts, Solar noticed Terra’s downfall not as a warning however as a chance to benefit from beleaguered buyers burned by a competitor.
Later within the yr, Solar resurfaced to promote his allegiance with Chandler Guo’s plan to fork Ethereum after the community’s “Merge” to Proof-of-Stake. Whereas most onlookers noticed the fork for what it was—an opportunistic money seize—Solar was relentless in his makes an attempt to revenue from the Merge hype.
Nonetheless, Solar’s most egregious plot focused these with funds trapped on FTX after the change declared chapter on November 11. TRON offered a “liquidity provision” to FTX, facilitating withdrawals for a number of Solar-affiliated tokens. As there have been so many FTX customers making an attempt to get funds off the change, these tokens’ costs skyrocketed. Customers paid enormous premiums on tokens like TRX and HT, permitting TRON to dump them at jacked-up costs and pocket the distinction. On this approach, Solar straight profited from the terrible state of affairs FTX left its clients in. Tim Craig
Gary Gensler
Supply: AP Picture/J. Scott Applewhite
In a yr marked by a pointy uptick in regulatory motion from the U.S. authorities, it was tough to kind by means of which company was this yr’s most nefarious—between the CFTC’s crackdown on DAOs to the Treasury unilaterally outlawing Twister Money, it’s exhausting to restrict ourselves to only one for this record.
However who’re we kidding? Everybody is aware of this yr’s coverage villain is Gary Gensler.
Sure, the SEC chair himself nonetheless stands tall because the crypto neighborhood’s most-reviled regulator in Washington. Lately Gensler has drawn explicit ire for his alleged connections to FTX and its officers. Gensler was a colleague of Caroline Ellison’s father, Glenn Ellison, who chaired the economics division at MIT when Gensler was on the college there. Caroline, who was ultimately made CEO of Alameda Analysis, has a protracted (and reportedly romantic) historical past with Bankman-Fried, courting again to their time working collectively at Jane Road. It’s a small world, in spite of everything.
Whereas it’s clear that there’s not less than some private acquaintanceship between these characters, there may be not but proof of something we may name felony conspiracy. It’s true that Gensler met with Sam Bankman-Fried in March of this yr, however little is thought in regards to the content material of the dialog. Fox Enterprise reported that Gensler crammed the assembly with a 45-minute lecture on U.S. securities legal guidelines with out listening to out Bankman-Fried’s considerations, which frankly rings extra true to my ears than the thought of any intentional collusion, as some are suggesting. It was additionally reported that Gensler’s pontifications included a warning about retaining Alameda and FTX strictly separate, which, if true, makes Bankman-Fried look even worse, not Gensler.
Nonetheless, there has hardly been such a constant, omnipresent boogeyman looming over the area as Gary Gensler, who has skilled his horrible gaze on the crypto business just like the Eye of Sauron. And but, the very fact stays that Sam Bankman-Fried, who was galavanting round Capitol Hill, snapping pics with lawmakers and taking conferences with the SEC Chair himself, orchestrated what appears to have been the biggest (and arguably least competent) fraud within the historical past of the business—and he did it proper below Gensler’s very nostril.
There are actual questions on why Gensler, infamous for respiratory down the neck of the crypto neighborhood, missed the wolf in sheep’s clothes parading round his stomping grounds. It hints at both ignorance, incompetence, or complicity, and it’s exhausting to say which of the three can be the worst. Jacob Oliver
Justin Trudeau
Supply: Reuters/Patrick Doyle
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau angered the crypto neighborhood in February for his draconian dealing with of the “Freedom Convoy” protests. When Canadian truckers blocked the streets of Ottawa in protest in opposition to COVID-19 vaccine mandates and restrictions, Trudeau responded by invoking the Canadian Emergencies Act. The choice granted the Canadian authorities energy to freeze the financial institution accounts of demonstrators (and of any people supporting the protests by means of donations) with out offering them recourse. The truckers countered by switching to Bitcoin and different crypto companies; this led the federal government to blacklist not less than 34 crypto wallets linked to the Freedom Convoy. The choice provoked a robust backlash, with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and Kraken CEO Jesse Powell urging their respective clients to make use of self-custodial wallets with the intention to shield themselves. The Ontario Securities Fee responded by reporting Armstrong and Powell’s tweets to legislation enforcement.
Trudeau’s determination to weaponize monetary establishments in opposition to strange Canadians was a surprising show of centralized energy. It additionally confirmed that residents of Western democracies are usually not assured entry to their banking companies. Bitcoin was created exactly to supply a permissionless, censorship-resistant various to such programs. In a twisted approach, we must be praising Trudeau for demonstrating the necessity for decentralized monetary instruments; he additionally implicitly proved the resiliency of such applied sciences—whereas the Canadian authorities was in a position to forbid firms from accepting funds from particular wallets, it couldn’t freeze crypto funds outright. Tom Carreras
Editor’s notice: This characteristic has been amended to incorporate feedback from Avraham Eisenberg. A earlier model said that he had attacked Solend and manipulated CRV’s token worth, however he denied these claims.
Disclosure: On the time of writing, some authors of this characteristic owned BTC, ETH, SOL, AAVE, CRV, and a number of other different crypto property.
Share this text
The data on or accessed by means of this web site is obtained from impartial sources we imagine to be correct and dependable, however Decentral Media, Inc. makes no illustration or guarantee as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any info on or accessed by means of this web site. Decentral Media, Inc. just isn’t an funding advisor. We don’t give customized funding recommendation or different monetary recommendation. The data on this web site is topic to vary with out discover. Some or the entire info on this web site might turn out to be outdated, or it could be or turn out to be incomplete or inaccurate. We might, however are usually not obligated to, replace any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate info.
It is best to by no means make an funding determination on an ICO, IEO, or different funding based mostly on the data on this web site, and you need to by no means interpret or in any other case depend on any of the data on this web site as funding recommendation. We strongly advocate that you just seek the advice of a licensed funding advisor or different certified monetary skilled if you’re looking for funding recommendation on an ICO, IEO, or different funding. We don’t settle for compensation in any kind for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, foreign money, tokenized gross sales, securities, or commodities.
See full phrases and situations.
Supply: TradingView